From ETO to CTO

From engineer-to-order to configure-to-order

Not two years of rebuilding before you sell. Sales sells only what is buildable, engineering standardises what actually sells, and every sold order makes the next one cheaper.

Engineer-to-order means every order costs engineering hours again, even the enquiry that closely resembles last month's. Configure-to-order means the thinking is done up front and the order merely selects. In logistics this is known as moving the customer order decoupling point. This page describes the route that actually works.

Where engineer-to-order holds you back

Two routes, and only one arrives

Comparison of the textbook route (modularise everything first, 18 to 24 months) with the sales route (live in weeks)
Whoever wants to finish everything first never goes live. Whoever is live finishes what demonstrably sells.

The textbook route, modularise the entire portfolio, perfect the catalogue, then build the configurator, sounds sensible but dies in analysis, while custom work keeps growing. The sales route inverts it. Pick one product, point the configurator at what you want to sell, go live, and modularise what sells. Every sold order makes the next one cheaper.

Smart tip

For your starter product, pick not your prettiest or newest but what sells most often. That is where every module pays for itself fastest.

Sixty to eighty percent is already identical

Analyse your order history and often 60 to 80% of every order is identical. Beware. Much of what looks like variety is accidental variety, three engineers who solved the same problem three ways. That is not customer demand; that is history. Real customer variety lives in a handful of positions, and a variety analysis points them out. Build choices there; the rest becomes standard.

The shift in engineering (and why it is not free)

The shift in engineering: from every order a work of art to building blocks with an owner, with hours moving from order work to product work
The hours do not disappear, they shift from repeat work per order to the product itself.

Honest talk. This truly demands something from engineering. Done means done (module with drawing, BOM, interface and documentation), reuse becomes the norm, every module gets an owner, and it costs months of capacity alongside running orders. Fail to plan for it and you get good intentions instead of modules. The reward is that pride shifts from the clever exception to the building block built a hundred times.

The real blocker? Not engineering. Sales.

Everyone expects resistance from engineering. In practice the real fight is in sales. A sales career is built on saying yes, and configure-to-order feels like selling no. Ignore that and custom work returns outside the configurator. The answer lives on the sales & dealers page. The configurator gives sales the fastest yes in the market.

What does it deliver? The honest numbers

30 to 80%
shorter quote lead time
from days to minutes
20 to 30%
fewer engineering hours
on quotes and repeat work
50 to 90%
fewer errors
reaching the shop floor

Ranges from public CPQ and modularisation research. Every source is on the numbers page. And then the headcount question. No, you will not need fewer engineers, you get more revenue per engineer. Four engineers spending thirty percent of their time on quotes? That is over one FTE per week, bought back without firing anyone. Building up costs capacity first, and the gains land where the configurator is live. So promise no layoffs. Promise growth without vacancies.

What you make does not change. How much you can sell with it does.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between engineer-to-order and configure-to-order?
With engineer-to-order (ETO) every customer order is engineered again. Investigating, drawing, calculating. With configure-to-order (CTO) the thinking is done up front in a product model. The order only selects from valid choices. The customer order decoupling point moves. Engineering happens before the order instead of after it.
Why do so many modularisation programmes fail?
Because they follow the textbook route. Modularise the whole portfolio first, then go live. In practice that takes 18 to 24 months, the programme dies in analysis, and custom work keeps growing meanwhile. The route that works is inverted. Bring one product live, then modularise what sells.
How many FTE does a configurator save?
You do not save engineers, you buy back capacity. Research points to 20 to 30% fewer engineering hours on quotes and repeat work. With four engineers spending 30% of their time on quotes, that is over one FTE per week, available for product improvement, without layoffs and without the vacancy you could not fill anyway.
Which product should I start with?
Pick the product that sells most often, and one whose standardisation engineering can handle alongside running orders. Volume means every module pays for itself fastest. Early on, every sold order still costs engineering hours. Do not start too broad.
What does the customer notice?
Faster quotes (from weeks to same day), prices that are correct while choosing, and delivery dates that hold because configured is buildable by definition.

The route starts with a product, not a programme.

We model one product line and let the first orders come in: valid, priced and buildable. From there, sales decides which module engineering standardises next.